Author
Listed:
- Kellen K Petersen
- Bhargav T Nallapu
- Richard B Lipton
- Ellen Grober
- Christos Davatzikos
- Danielle J Harvey
- Ilya M Nasrallah
- Ali Ezzati
Abstract
ObjectivesThe aim of this work is to use a machine learning framework to develop simple risk scores for predicting β-amyloid (Aβ) and tau positivity among individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).MethodsData for 657 individuals with MCI from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) data set were used. A modified version of AutoScore, a machine learning-based software tool, was used to develop risk scores based on hierarchical combinations of predictor categories, including demographics, neuropsychological assessments, APOE4 status, and imaging biomarkers.ResultsThe highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting Aβ positivity was 0.79, which was achieved by 2 separate models with predictors of age, Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog), APOE4 status, and either Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B) or white matter hyperintensity. The best-performing model for tau positivity had an AUC of 0.91 using age, ADAS-13, and TMT-B scores, APOE4 information, abnormal hippocampal volume, and amyloid status as predictors.DiscussionSimple integer-based risk scores using available data could be used for predicting Aβ and tau positivity in individuals with MCI. Models have the potential to improve clinical trials through improved screening of individuals.
Suggested Citation
Kellen K Petersen & Bhargav T Nallapu & Richard B Lipton & Ellen Grober & Christos Davatzikos & Danielle J Harvey & Ilya M Nasrallah & Ali Ezzati, 2025.
"Development of Simple Risk Scores for Prediction of Brain β-Amyloid and Tau Status in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Machine Learning Approach,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(7), pages 328-341.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:7:p:328-341.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:7:p:328-341.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.