IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v80y2025i6p567-576..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Association Between Disability Status of the Caregivers and Their Perceived Mental Strain: Hong Kong Population-Based Study of Caregivers of Older Adults With Disabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Shan Mao
  • Tarani Chandola
  • Vivian Weiqun Lou
  • Dara Kiu Yi Leung

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study investigated the association between caregivers’ disability status and their mental strain when caring for family members with disabilities. Moreover, we examined the moderating roles of caregiving time and the presence of additional caregivers in this association.MethodsData were selected from a territory-wide survey of people with disabilities in Hong Kong, which included 85,700 family caregivers of people with disabilities. Logistic regression was adopted to test the study hypotheses. Weights were applied for all analyses to ensure the sample was representative of the population.ResultsCaregivers’ disability status was associated with higher levels of mental strain among family caregivers of people with disabilities (odds ratio [OR] = 2.58, p

Suggested Citation

  • Shan Mao & Tarani Chandola & Vivian Weiqun Lou & Dara Kiu Yi Leung, 2025. "The Association Between Disability Status of the Caregivers and Their Perceived Mental Strain: Hong Kong Population-Based Study of Caregivers of Older Adults With Disabilities," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(6), pages 567-576.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:6:p:567-576.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaf044
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:6:p:567-576.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.