IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v80y2025i6p419-435..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nature-Based Welfare in Older Adulthood: An Eco-Appreciation Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Mali Nevo
  • Lia Levin

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study examined the reciprocal relationship between older adults’ well-being and their accounts of human-nature relations (HNR). Guided by the tenets of the Eco-Appreciation Perspective, the question addressed was: What can be learned from older adults’ relations with nature about reciprocal nature-based welfare in older adulthood?MethodsIn-depth interviews were conducted with 60 participants over the age of 65 in Israel, followed by a sequential deductive-inductive analysis of the data.ResultsFour major themes were yielded: HNR as presence and being; HNR as connection; HNR as past, present, and future; and HNR as benevolence. Participants’ experiences revealed an interaction between gratitude and awareness toward HNR and an enhanced sense of well-being, purpose, meaning, and belonging. The analysis also exposed novel insights into how HNR in older adulthood can prompt mutual nature-based welfare and provide an ongoing source of comfort and resilience, both through current activities and by accessing childhood memories.DiscussionThe findings are discussed in the context of eco-centric viewpoints on contemporary aging, and highlight the active role that older adults can play in deepening their connection with nature while calling on professionals in health, gerontology, social work, and community care to recognize and harness the mutual benefits of this bond.

Suggested Citation

  • Mali Nevo & Lia Levin, 2025. "Nature-Based Welfare in Older Adulthood: An Eco-Appreciation Perspective," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(6), pages 419-435.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:6:p:419-435.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaf041
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:6:p:419-435.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.