Author
Abstract
ObjectivesThis study aimed to explore the walking experiences of older adults in Seoul by uncovering the interaction between perception, behavior, and the environment. Specifically, we provided a thick description of how walking shapes and reflects self-identity, social connections, and everyday practices among older adults living in a walkable urban neighborhood.MethodsA qualitative geographic information system approach was employed to integrate qualitative and geospatial methods. From July to December 2020, 38 older adults residing in a pedestrian-friendly neighborhood in Seoul were recruited. Data collection involved individual in-depth interviews, mobile global positioning system (GPS) tracking, and ActiGraph monitoring. Thematic coding and categorization of interview data was integrated with GPS and ActiGraph data to identify patterns and contextual conditions for walking.ResultsOlder adults in this study perceived walking as essential to their autonomy and well-being, reinforcing a healthy self-image and fostering social connections. The dense and diverse urban environment facilitated walking for both leisure and practical purposes, creating opportunities for social interaction and informal social safety networks. However, participants who walked for work, such as collecting recyclables, achieved fewer physical health benefits than those who walked for leisure. The integration of qualitative and spatial behavioral data triangulated participants’ narratives with neighborhood walking patterns in activity levels, purpose-specific routes, and natural social hubs.DiscussionThese insights highlight the need for urban health policies to prioritize walkable environments that promote active living and equitable access to daily opportunities for older adults. Addressing these challenges requires practical strategies that promote healthy aging and reduce social inequalities supporting everyday physical and social engagements.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:6:p:101755-9.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.