IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v80y2025i5p1049-1062..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive Performance and Long-term Exposure to Outdoor Air Pollution: Findings From the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol Substudy of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA-HCAP)

Author

Listed:
  • Giorgio Di Gessa
  • Mikaela Bloomberg
  • Rina So
  • Shaun Scholes
  • Thomas Byrne
  • Jinkook Lee
  • Sara D Adar
  • Paola Zaninotto
  • Lewis A Lipsitz

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough air pollution is associated with worse cognitive performance, whether these relationships differ by cognitive domain and which sources of air pollution are particularly detrimental to cognition remains understudied. This study examined associations between cognitive scores across 3 domains in older adults and 8–10 years of exposure to air pollutants (NO2, total PM2.5, and PM2.5 from different emission sources).MethodsWe used data from the 2018 Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol substudy of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (N = 1 127). Outdoor concentrations of each pollutant were estimated for 2008/2010–2017 and summarized using means and group-based trajectories. Linear regression models were used to assess long-term air pollution exposure relationships with memory, executive function, language, and global cognitive function after adjustment for key individual and neighborhood-level confounders.ResultsAssociations between air pollution trajectories and cognition are mostly inverted j-shaped, with respondents exposed to the highest residential levels of NO2 and total PM2.5 having worse performance for global cognition (β = −.241; 95% CI = [−0.46, −0.02] and β = −.334; 95% CI = [−0.55, −0.12], respectively) than those exposed to average levels of pollution. Similar associations were also found for executive function and memory (PM2.5 only), whereas more compelling dose–response evidence was found for language. Higher emissions from industry and residential combustion, as well as biofuel, coal, and oil and natural gas combustion, were associated with worse language scores.ConclusionsAir pollution and its sources have domain-specific associations with cognitive performance, with most consistent evidence observed for language. Continued efforts to reduce air pollution, particularly where levels are the highest, might benefit cognitive performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Giorgio Di Gessa & Mikaela Bloomberg & Rina So & Shaun Scholes & Thomas Byrne & Jinkook Lee & Sara D Adar & Paola Zaninotto & Lewis A Lipsitz, 2025. "Cognitive Performance and Long-term Exposure to Outdoor Air Pollution: Findings From the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol Substudy of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA-HCAP)," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(5), pages 1049-1062.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:5:p:1049-1062.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/gerona/glaf060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cognition; Emission sources; NO2; PM2.5; Pollution;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:5:p:1049-1062.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.