IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v80y2025i12pgbaf179..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning approaches to racial/ethnic differences in social determinants of mild cognitive impairment and its progression to dementia in the All of Us Research Program

Author

Listed:
  • Qianyu Dong
  • Wenbo Wu
  • Yanping Jiang
  • Junyu Sui
  • Chenxin Tan
  • Xiang Qi

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study examines how social determinants of health (SDOH) influence mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and its progression to dementia across racial/ethnic groups, identifying disparities and key predictors using machine learning approaches.MethodsWe analyzed data from 83,180 participants aged 50+ in the All of Us Research Program (65,582 White, 6,207 Black, 4,170 Hispanic, 7,221 Other). The sample had mean ages ranging from 62.4 (Hispanic) to 68.1 (White) years, with significant gender disparities (70.9% Black females vs. 46.0% Other females). We developed machine learning classification models to predict MCI and its progression to dementia across the four racial/ethnic groups using 18 SDOH, along with key sociodemographic variables. We then applied SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to quantify each factor’s contribution and interpret its risk and protective effects on individual predictions.ResultsMCI prevalence was comparable across groups (7.5%–8.0%), but progression to dementia varied (9.4% Black vs. 11.4% Other). Perceived stress was the strongest predictor of MCI across all groups, with SHAP values of 15.1% (White), 13.5% (Black), 17.4% (Other), and 19.3% (Hispanic). Predictors of progression to dementia varied by groups: perceived stress (7.0%) for Whites, instrumental social support (14.2%) for Hispanics, daily spiritual experience (34.0%) for Blacks, and everyday discrimination (11.2%) for other groups.DiscussionThe findings underscore the need for group-specific interventions addressing stress mitigation for MCI prevention and culturally-tailored support systems to delay dementia progression. This machine learning approach reveals complex SDOH interactions that traditional methods might overlook, particularly for racial/ethnic underrepresented populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Qianyu Dong & Wenbo Wu & Yanping Jiang & Junyu Sui & Chenxin Tan & Xiang Qi, 2025. "Machine learning approaches to racial/ethnic differences in social determinants of mild cognitive impairment and its progression to dementia in the All of Us Research Program," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(12), pages 179.-179..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:12:p:gbaf179.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaf179
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:12:p:gbaf179.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.