Author
Listed:
- Lawrence Ejike Ugwu
- Erhabor Sunday Idemudia
Abstract
ObjectivesThis study examines the longitudinal relationship between the number of children and psychological well-being, specifically depressive symptoms and subjective well-being (SWB), among older adults in rural South Africa. Grounded in life course theory and the family stress model, it explores whether larger family sizes offer protection or constitute psychological stressors in later life, with attention to gender differences.MethodsData were drawn from 3 waves (2014–2015, 2018–2019, and 2021–2022) of the Health and Aging in Africa: A Longitudinal Study of an INDEPTH Community in South Africa, including 2,775 adults aged 60+. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the 8-item for the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale; SWB was measured using a single-item life satisfaction scale. Cross-lagged panel structural equation modeling with multigroup analysis by gender-tested reciprocal pathways, adjusting for key sociodemographic covariates.ResultsA higher number of children was significantly associated with increased depressive symptoms (β = 0.14, p = .004) and reduced SWB (β = –0.12, p = .008) over time. Gender-stratified models showed stronger effects among women. Depressive symptoms and SWB exhibited strong temporal stability and reciprocal influence across waves. The model-explained variance was modest (R2 range = 0.002–0.024), suggesting additional, unmeasured factors.DiscussionContrary to cultural expectations, large families may increase psychological vulnerability in old age, especially for women. We introduce the Intergenerational Support Dissonance framework to explain how unmet expectations of filial support can erode well-being. Findings highlight the need for gender-sensitive aging policies and alternative support systems in sub-Saharan Africa.
Suggested Citation
Lawrence Ejike Ugwu & Erhabor Sunday Idemudia, 2025.
"Kin to strain: longitudinal impacts of family size on mental health among aging South Africans,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(12), pages 168.-168..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:12:p:gbaf168.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:12:p:gbaf168.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.