IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v80y2025i11pgbaf167..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who declines, who maintains? Trajectories of physical function and the role of social determinants of health in adults aging with physical disability

Author

Listed:
  • Seeun Park
  • Ivan Molton

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study sought to explore longitudinal trajectories of physical function in middle-aged and older adults living with long-term physical disability and to evaluate the impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) on physical function over time.MethodsThis study utilized 3 waves of an existing longitudinal survey on aging and disability, collected over a 2-year span. Participants were adults aged 45 and older with physical disability due to spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, or post-polio syndrome. Physical function was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function measure. SDOH included health service availability, healthcare provider relationships, financial and physical barriers to healthcare, disability benefits, transportation access, community accessibility, and caregiving availability. Growth mixture modeling was employed to identify distinct physical function trajectory classes, and multinomial logistic regression was used to examine associations between SDOH and trajectory class membership.ResultsA total of 1,345 participants were included in the analysis. Four distinct physical function trajectory classes were identified: High-improving, High-declining, Moderate-declining, and Low-declining. Individuals in the Low-declining class were more likely to experience adverse SDOH, such as lower income, greater physical barriers to healthcare, and limited community accessibility.DiscussionThese results highlight the importance of unfavorable SDOH, particularly limited access to healthcare and community environments, in contributing to poorer physical health trajectories in people with disabilities. Inaccessible healthcare settings and community environments are not trivial inconveniences, but structural determinants that shape how people with disabilities age, suggesting that inclusive environments are foundational to achieving equity in aging.

Suggested Citation

  • Seeun Park & Ivan Molton, 2025. "Who declines, who maintains? Trajectories of physical function and the role of social determinants of health in adults aging with physical disability," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(11), pages 167.-167..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:11:p:gbaf167.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaf167
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:11:p:gbaf167.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.