Author
Listed:
- Matthew A Andersson
- Catherine E Harnois
- Max E Coleman
Abstract
ObjectiveDiscrimination of various types is associated with social stress, which in turn is implicated in later-life cognitive decline. However, women who have higher socioeconomic status and who are younger are more likely to perceive gender discrimination. This leaves unclear whether gender discrimination bears independent, detrimental links to later-life cognition.MethodsWe implement longitudinal regression analyses of the 1995–2015 National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States (baseline ages 25–74) that consider follow-up cognitive performance as it relates to midlife gender discrimination.ResultsContrary to a social stress perspective, we find positive associations between women’s midlife experiences of gender discrimination and cognitive performance at 10- and 20-year follow-up. These consistent, robust associations are mostly accounted for by differences in age and socioeconomic status, consistent with tokenism in the workplace and changing consciousness and experiences of discrimination across generations. They remain intact after probability-based adjustments for survey attrition and across analyses of discrimination subscores.DiscussionFollowing our results, we propose that future research on gender discrimination should pay closer attention to positionalities that intersect gender with age and other social statuses. Meanwhile, we urge greater research attention to other aspects of structural sexism at the cultural, organizational, or internalized levels that are still likely to be harmful for women’s cognitive health in some capacity. We also encourage further attention to intersectional discrimination involving ethno-racial statuses in particular.
Suggested Citation
Matthew A Andersson & Catherine E Harnois & Max E Coleman, 2025.
"Midlife gender discrimination and later-life cognition: results from the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(11), pages 143.-143..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:11:p:gbaf143.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:11:p:gbaf143.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.