Author
Listed:
- Clarissa M E Richardson
- Yanping Jiang
- Annie L Nguyen
Abstract
ObjectivesWe investigated the interactive effects of social support gap (SSGap) and daily event stress on daily affect among older adults. We hypothesized that SSGap would be associated with decreased daily positive affect (PA) and increased daily negative affect (NA). We also hypothesized that there would be significant interactive effects of daily SSGap and daily event stress on daily affect.MethodsTo test these hypotheses, we conducted a daily diary study with 145 older adults ages 65–89 (M = 73.5, SD = 6.0). Participants completed seven daily surveys assessing the stress and emotional support they received and needed each day, in addition to positive and NAs.ResultsAs hypothesized, there were significant within-person relationships between daily SSGap (i.e., received less support than needed) and affect. That is, on days when participants reported larger daily SSGaps than usual, they reported higher levels of NA and lower levels of PA. Additionally, there was a significant interactive effect of SSGap and daily event stress on daily NA. Specifically, participants exhibited higher levels of NA following daily event stress on days reporting large SSGaps than on days reporting small SSGaps.DiscussionThese findings advance the current understanding of the stress-buffering effects of social support and highlight the importance of considering the gap between received and needed social support when considering the impact of social support on well-being among older adults when experiencing stress.
Suggested Citation
Clarissa M E Richardson & Yanping Jiang & Annie L Nguyen, 2025.
"Influence of social support gap during daily stress on daily affect of older adults,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(11), pages 142.-142..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:11:p:gbaf142.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:11:p:gbaf142.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.