Author
Listed:
- Annabel P tison
- Suraj Samtani
- Henry Brodaty
- Perminder S Sachdev
- Simone Reppermund
Abstract
ObjectivesFew studies have examined the association between social frailty and dementia. We aim to assess if social frailty indices predict dementia and evaluate causality.MethodsData from 851 community-dwelling participants aged 70 years and older without dementia from the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study were used. Social frailty was assessed using five published indices that incorporated a range of psychosocial factors. Incident dementia was assessed by consensus diagnosis using biennial neuropsychological tests over a 12-year period.ResultsBased on Cox regression, social frailty was predictive of an increased risk of incident dementia using three different indices. After adjusting for a range of confounders, including physical and psychological frailty, evidence of a causal association was found using one of the indices (socially frail vs nonfrail hazard ratio [HR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–2.07). Low financial and family satisfaction, infrequent social contacts, and limited participation in social activities and volunteering were associated with an increased risk of dementia, with low financial satisfaction an independent predictor.DiscussionWell-designed social frailty indices are an effective way to help identify older adults at increased risk of dementia. Replication of these findings in other cohorts is necessary to validate a screening tool for social frailty. Screening for social frailty using brief measures in priry care is a key next step, alongside social prescribing programs for those at risk of social frailty and cognitive decline.
Suggested Citation
Annabel P tison & Suraj Samtani & Henry Brodaty & Perminder S Sachdev & Simone Reppermund, 2025.
"How well do social frailty indices predict incident dementia in older adults?,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(10), pages 148.-148..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:10:p:gbaf148.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:10:p:gbaf148.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.