Author
Listed:
- Alexa BraggMBA
- Theodore J Iwashyna
- Chanee D Fabius
Abstract
ObjectivesThe aging population in the United States is increasingly diverse, particularly among community-dwelling individuals with disabilities. Black and Hispanic older adults experience greater reliance on assistance with daily activities (e.g., bathing, shopping, banking) than White adults. Assistance is often provided by multiple caregivers helping with the same tasks (“role-sharing†). We describe patterns of shared care by examining racial and ethnic differences in role-sharing in 2015 and 2022.MethodsWe use weighted, repeated cross-sectional data from the 2015 and 2022 National Health and Aging Trends Study, focusing on Black, White, and Hispanic community-dwelling care recipients (n = 3,050 in 2015; n = 2,318 in 2022) who receive assistance with household (e.g., shopping), self-care (e.g., bathing, dressing), mobility (e.g., getting around indoors), or medical activities (e.g., medication nagement) due to health or functioning limitations. Logistic regression models using generalized estiting equations assessed race differences in experiencing role-sharing, adjusting for older adult characteristics and survey year.ResultsRole-sharing was most common in the household assistance doin, with approxitely 30% of all groups reporting role-sharing in both years. In fully adjusted models, Hispanic recipients experienced lower odds of role-sharing for household tasks (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.57–0.91) compared to White care recipients. Racial and ethnic differences were not observed in other care doins, and role-sharing prevalence was consistent in 2015 and 2022.DiscussionFindings underscore the complexity of caregiving networks and inform strategies to improve collaboration and reduce role ambiguity among role-sharing caregivers.
Suggested Citation
Alexa BraggMBA & Theodore J Iwashyna & Chanee D Fabius, 2025.
"Evolution of shared care networks by race and ethnicity: findings from the National Health and Aging Trends Study,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(10), pages 147.-147..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:10:p:gbaf147.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:10:p:gbaf147.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.