IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v80y2025i10pgbaf138..html

Grandparenting and coresidence preferences in Shanghai, China: the influence of grandparenting beliefs, experiences, and intensity

Author

Listed:
  • Ying
  • Qiushi Feng
  • Zhihong Zhen
  • Litao Zhao

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study aims to examine the living arrangement preferences of older adults in Shanghai, China, with a focus on grandparenting as a shaping factor.MethodsThis study utilizes data from the 2022 Lifelong Education for Aging Productively in Shanghai survey, which included 1,707 older adults aged 55–85. Since this study focuses on grandparenting, respondents without grandchildren were excluded, resulting in an analytical sample of 1,250 individuals. In this study, grandparenting is measured through grandparenting beliefs, frequency of grandchild care, and previous grandparenting experiences.ResultsThe results indicate a decisive shift toward independent living, with 90% preferring to live alone or with a spouse. However, preferences adapt when adult children require support, including grandparenting. Our analysis shows that grandparenting beliefs, experiences, and intensity are positively associated with the preference for coresidence.DiscussionThese findings highlight the lleability of living arrangement preferences and suggest a persistent, though evolving, form of intergenerational solidarity. This study contributes to the literature by emphasizing the importance of adult children’s needs in shaping parents’ living arrangement preferences in contemporary urban China.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying & Qiushi Feng & Zhihong Zhen & Litao Zhao, 2025. "Grandparenting and coresidence preferences in Shanghai, China: the influence of grandparenting beliefs, experiences, and intensity," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(10), pages 138.-138..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:10:p:gbaf138.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaf138
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:10:p:gbaf138.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.