IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v80y2025i10pgbaf137..html

Black and White older adults’ end-of-life experiences: does hospice use mitigate racial disparities?

Author

Listed:
  • Deborah Carr
  • Lucie Kalousová

Abstract

ObjectivesRacial disparities in end-of-life care are well documented, but less is known about how these inequalities shape assessments of death quality. This study examines Black–White differences in two core dimensions of proxy-reported end-of-life experience: perceived death quality and perceived care concordance. We also assess whether hospice care moderates racial differences in death quality outcomes.MethodsData are from the Health and Retirement Study Core and Exit Interviews conducted between January 2018 and September 2023. Our analytic sample included 2,498 decedents (450 Black, 2,048 White). Multivariable ordinary least squares and logistic regression models are used to estite the associations between race, hospice use, and our two end-of-life experience outcomes.ResultsProxies for Black decedents reported higher perceived death quality than those for White decedents, despite evidence of greater structural disadvantage. However, perceived care concordance was significantly lower among Black decedents. Hospice care was associated with improved perceived death quality for Black decedents but not for Whites. When accounting for socioeconomic and death experience controls, hospice care did not moderate perceived care concordance.DiscussionOur findings highlight the importance of considering expectations, context, and reference group comparisons when interpreting subjective end-of-life measures. Expanding equitable access to high-quality hospice care y help reduce persistent racial disparities, but interventions must also address how care is experienced, evaluated, and aligned with individual preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Deborah Carr & Lucie Kalousová, 2025. "Black and White older adults’ end-of-life experiences: does hospice use mitigate racial disparities?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(10), pages 137.-137..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:10:p:gbaf137.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaf137
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:10:p:gbaf137.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.