Author
Listed:
- Alyssa W Goldman
- Megan Doherty Bea
- Kenzie Latham-Mintus
Abstract
ObjectivesAccess to local banking represents an understudied dimension of neighborhood-based inequalities that could significantly influence older adults’ perceptions of their neighborhood spaces in ways that matter for disparities in well-being. We evaluate disparities in banking access and then examine how local banking access informs older adults’ perceptions of neighborhood collective efficacy and danger, above and beyond other neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics.MethodsWe use nationally representative data from older adults in the United States who were interviewed at Round 3 of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project, linked with data on banks in respondents’ residential and surrounding census tracts from the National Establishment Time-Series database, in a series of bivariate and multivariable regression analyses.ResultsWhite older adults and those with higher levels of education have significantly greater local banking access than Black and Hispanic older adults and those with lower levels of education. Higher rates of local banking institutions are associated with significantly lower perceptions of neighborhood danger, but not with perceived collective efficacy. This finding emerges when accounting for neighborhood concentrated disadvantage and physical disorder.DiscussionLocal banks may represent neighborhood investment and the broader economic vitality of a community, as well as the ability of communities to meet older adults’ everyday needs in ways that enhance older residents’ feelings of safety. Increasing access to local financial institutions may help attenuate neighborhood-based contributors to inequalities in health and well-being among the older adult population.
Suggested Citation
Alyssa W Goldman & Megan Doherty Bea & Kenzie Latham-Mintus, 2024.
"Banking on the Neighborhood? Inequalities in Older Adults’ Access to Local Banking and Neighborhood Perceptions,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 79(4), pages 355-392.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:4:p:355-392.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:4:p:355-392.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.