IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v79y2024i3p556-570..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Daily Rumination–Affect Associations in Dyads During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Zambrano Garza
  • Rachel A Murphy
  • Wolfgang Linden
  • Maureen C Ashe
  • Kenneth M Madden
  • Jennifer M Jakobi
  • Anita DeLongis
  • Denis Gerstorf
  • Christiane A Hoppmann
  • Shevaun D Neupert

Abstract

ObjectivesNegative and repetitive self-oriented thinking (rumination) is associated with lower well-being and health. The social context of rumination remains underexplored and mostly centers on marital relationships. To embrace the diversity of older adult relationships, this study includes a range of different relationships (e.g., spouses, siblings, friends, etc.) and examines the role of rumination by close others on individual well-being during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.MethodsUsing daily diary data from 140 Canadian older adults (M = 72.21 years, standard deviation [SD] = 5.39, range: 63–87 years, 47% women, 71% university educated) and a close other of their choice (M = 59.95 years, SD = 16.54, range: 18–83 years, 78% women, 81% university educated), this project builds on past research examining daily life rumination dynamics from a dyadic perspective. For 10 days, both dyad members reported their daily rumination and affect quality in the evening.ResultsMultilevel models replicate past work showing that individual rumination was associated with higher negative affect (within-person: b = 0.27, p

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Zambrano Garza & Rachel A Murphy & Wolfgang Linden & Maureen C Ashe & Kenneth M Madden & Jennifer M Jakobi & Anita DeLongis & Denis Gerstorf & Christiane A Hoppmann & Shevaun D Neupert, 2024. "Daily Rumination–Affect Associations in Dyads During the COVID-19 Pandemic," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 79(3), pages 556-570.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:3:p:556-570.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbad187
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:3:p:556-570.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.