Author
Listed:
- Wencheng Zhang
- Merril Silverstein
- Anna Zajacova
Abstract
ObjectivesWe aim to investigate the association between children’s economic status and parents’ self-rated health and examine the potential mediating mechanisms for this relationship.MethodsUtilizing nationally representative data in China in 2014, this study predicted parent’s self-rated health from children’s economic status using inverse probability of treatment weighting to account for selection and endogeneity bias. We further examined depressive symptoms, kin and nonkin social support networks, emotional closeness to children, and economic support from children, as potential mediators of this relationship.ResultsThe study reveals that parents whose children had greater economic success tended to have better self-rated health. For both rural and urban older adults, depressive symptoms served as the most influential mediator. However, only among rural older adults did the size of their support networks mediate the relationship between children’s economic status and perceived health.DiscussionThe results from this study suggest that children’s economic success contributes to better self-rated health among older adults. In part, this relationship was explained by better emotional well-being and greater availability of support resources among parents in rural areas with successful children. This quasi-causal analysis demonstrates that adult children remain important for the well-being of their older parents in China, but also suggests that health inequalities in later life are exacerbated by the chance of having economically successful offspring.
Suggested Citation
Wencheng Zhang & Merril Silverstein & Anna Zajacova, 2023.
"Does the Economic Status of Adult Children Influence Self-Rated Health Among Older Adults in China?,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(9), pages 1604-1616.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:9:p:1604-1616.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:9:p:1604-1616.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.