Author
Listed:
- Shen (Lamson) Lin
- Lin Fang
- Jessica Kelley
Abstract
ObjectivesDespite the predominance of chronic disease clustering, primary care delivery for multimorbid patients tends to be less effective and often uncoordinated. This study aims to quantify racial–nativity inequalities in multimorbidity prevalence ≥3 chronic conditions), access to primary care, and relations to past-year subjective unmet health care needs (SUN) among older Canadians.MethodsPopulation-based data were drawn from the Canadian Community Health Survey (2015–2018). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the likelihood of multimorbidity, sites of usual source of primary care (USOC), primary care coordination, and multidimensional aspects of SUN. The Classification and Regression Tree (CART) was applied to identify intersecting determinants of SUN.ResultsThe overall sample (n = 19,020) were predominantly (69.4%) Canadian-born (CB) Whites (1% CB non-Whites, 18.1% White immigrants, and 11.5% racialized immigrants). Compared with CB Whites, racialized immigrants were more likely to have multimorbidity (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.35, 99% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13–1.61), lack a USOC (AOR = 1.41, 99% CI: 1.07–1.84), and report higher SUN (AOR = 1.47, 99% CI: 1.02–2.11). Racialized immigrants’ greater SUN was driven by heightened affordability barriers (AOR = 4.31, 99% CI: 2.02–9.16), acceptability barriers (AOR = 3.11, 99% CI: 1.90–5.10), and unmet needs for chronic care (AOR = 2.71, 99% CI: 1.53–4.80) than CB Whites. The CART analysis found that the racial–nativity gap in SUN perception was still evident even among those who had access to nonpoorly coordinated care.DiscussionTo achieve an equitable chronic care system, efforts need to tackle affordability barriers, improve service acceptability, minimize service fragmentation, and reallocate treatment resources to underserved older racialized immigrants in Canada.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:2:p:302-318.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.