IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022isupplement_2ps158-s166..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socioeconomic Disparities Do Not Explain the U.S. International Disadvantage in Mortality

Author

Listed:
  • Magali Barbieri

Abstract

ObjectivesThe articles examines the contribution of internal socioeconomic disparities in mortality to the U.S. international disadvantage in life expectancy at birth.MethodsUsing individual death records from the U.S. national vital statistics system for years 1982–2019 and data for other countries from the Human Mortality Database, we compare age-specific death rates and life expectancy between counties classified into 10 socioeconomic categories and 20 high-income countries. We also calculate the number of years of life lost in each socioeconomic decile in relation to the comparison set.ResultsThere is a clear and increasing socioeconomic gradient of mortality in the United States, but the growing divergence in internal mortality trends does not explain the rising gap between the country and its peers. In 2019, even American women in the most socioeconomically advantaged decile lived shorter lives, while only 10% of men in the most affluent decile fared better than their peers. The long-standing U.S. disadvantage in young adult mortality has been growing and the country’s previous advantage in mortality at ages 75 years and older has virtually disappeared for all but for Americans in the most affluent counties.DiscussionThe similar age pattern of differences in mortality rates between each socioeconomic deciles and the comparison group suggests that the underlying factors might be the same. The role of external causes (including drug overdoses) for middle-aged adults and a slowing down in progress to control cardiovascular diseases at older ages at the national level are consistent with this pattern.

Suggested Citation

  • Magali Barbieri, 2022. "Socioeconomic Disparities Do Not Explain the U.S. International Disadvantage in Mortality," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(Supplemen), pages 158-166.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:supplement_2:p:s158-s166.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbac030
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:supplement_2:p:s158-s166.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.