IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021isupplement_3ps276-s286..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Couple Analysis in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project

Author

Listed:
  • Jaclyn S Wong
  • Ning Hsieh
  • Merril Silverstein

Abstract

ObjectivesMarital and intimate partner relationships are some of the most important social ties that shape older adults’ health and well-being. This paper provides analytic guidelines for the couple data in Round 2 (2010–2011) and Round 3 (2015–2016) of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP) to encourage more research on marriage and partnership in late life.MethodFirst, we describe the recruitment of couples and outline how to identify partners in the data sets. Second, we provide descriptive information about the couple sample. Third, we offer guidance for analyzing the dyadic data cross-sectionally and longitudinally.ResultsRound 2 interviewed all primary respondents and a sample of their current cohabiting partners and spouses (n = 955 couples). In Round 3, NSHAP reinterviewed the primary respondents and partners who participated in Round 2 (Cohort 1; n = 621 couples) and recruited a new sample of age-eligible adults along with any cohabiting romantic partners (Cohort 2; n = 766 couples). Couples can be identified using a household ID variable in Round 2 and a partner ID variable in Round 3. Demographic characteristics of the couple sample vary by round and cohort.DiscussionResearchers can use data from either round to conduct cross-sectional dyadic analyses to examine issues faced by older couples. A common strategy for couple analysis is the actor–partner interdependence model. With 2 rounds of couple-level data, researchers may consider using cross-lagged models in their research.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaclyn S Wong & Ning Hsieh & Merril Silverstein, 2021. "Couple Analysis in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(Supplemen), pages 276-286.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:supplement_3:p:s276-s286.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbab061
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:supplement_3:p:s276-s286.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.