IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021isupplement_3ps215-s225..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ongoing Refinement and Innovation in the Data Collection Protocols of the Third Round of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project

Author

Listed:
  • Katie O’Doherty
  • Daniel Lawrence
  • Anna Wiencrot
  • Sara Walsh
  • Jennifer Satorius
  • Erin Burgess
  • Lauren Sedlak
  • Kriston Koepp
  • Stephen Smith
  • Robert B Wallace

Abstract

ObjectivesThe third round (R3) of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project, a nationally representative, longitudinal survey of community-residing older adults, consisted of 4,777 in-person interviews and 6,100 completed visits to households to identify newly eligible respondents. It revisited respondents from the first rounds (Cohort 1), born in the years 1920 through 1947, and added new respondents (Cohort 2) born in the years 1948 through 1965. Coresidential romantic partners of both cohorts were also eligible. Data collection included in-person questionnaires, up to 11 biomeasures, and a self-administered, postinterview paper questionnaire.MethodsQuestionnaire domains included social network and social support, elder mistreatment, physical health, cognitive function, romantic partners and sexuality, fertility and menopause, mental health, and employment and finances. Biomeasure collection included height, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure and heart rate, timed walk, balance, chair stands, smell, saliva passive drool in a tube (cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone, estradiol, progesterone, testosterone), dried blood spots (C-reactive protein, Epstein–Barr virus antibodies, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hemoglobin, glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c], total cholesterol), and accelerometry (sleep patterns and physical activity). A brief questionnaire also collected data on respondents who were deceased or in too poor health to participate.ResultsMeasures such as response and cooperation rates are provided to evaluate the design and implementation.DiscussionThis article describes innovation in the development and implementation of R3, the recruitment of a new cohort of respondents, and fidelity to prior rounds’ study design and data collection procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Katie O’Doherty & Daniel Lawrence & Anna Wiencrot & Sara Walsh & Jennifer Satorius & Erin Burgess & Lauren Sedlak & Kriston Koepp & Stephen Smith & Robert B Wallace, 2021. "Ongoing Refinement and Innovation in the Data Collection Protocols of the Third Round of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(Supplemen), pages 215-225.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:supplement_3:p:s215-s225.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbab179
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Aging; Biomeasures; Health; NSHAP; Survey;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:supplement_3:p:s215-s225.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.