IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021i5p956-967..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Foreclosure Crisis, Community Change, and the Cognitive Health of Older Adults
[Perceived stress and change in cognitive function among adults aged 65 and older]

Author

Listed:
  • Esther M Friedman
  • Jason N Houle
  • Kathleen A Cagney
  • Mary E Slaughter
  • Regina A Shih
  • Deborah Carr

Abstract

ObjectivesWhile home foreclosures are often thought of as a household-level event, the consequences may be far-reaching, and spill over to the broader community. Older adults, in particular, could be affected by the spiral of community changes that result from foreclosures, but we know very little about how the foreclosure crisis is related to older adult health, in particular cognition.MethodThis article uses growth curve models and data from the Health and Retirement Study matched to Census and county-level foreclosure data to examine whether community foreclosures are related to older adults’ cognitive health and the mechanisms responsible.ResultsWe find that higher rates of county-level foreclosures are associated with a faster decline in individual cognition at older ages. Although we examined an extensive number of individual and community mechanisms, including individual housing wealth and depressive symptoms, community structural factors, social factors, and perceptions of physical disorder and cohesion, none of the mechanisms examined here explained this relationship.DiscussionThis study shows that the adverse consequences of home foreclosures spill over to the local community, with implications for the cognitive health of older adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Esther M Friedman & Jason N Houle & Kathleen A Cagney & Mary E Slaughter & Regina A Shih & Deborah Carr, 2021. "The Foreclosure Crisis, Community Change, and the Cognitive Health of Older Adults [Perceived stress and change in cognitive function among adults aged 65 and older]," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(5), pages 956-967.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:5:p:956-967.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaa047
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:5:p:956-967.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.