IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021i4p711-721..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Gain and Loss Incentives Affect Memory for Intentions Across Adulthood?

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian S Horn
  • Alexandra M Freund
  • Angela Gutchess

Abstract

ObjectivesChanges in motivational orientation across adulthood affect cognitive processes. The purpose of this research was to investigate if and how motivational incentives (gains or losses) affect prospective memory for intended actions in younger, middle-aged, and older adults.MethodsThe consequences of memory hits and misses and the framing of the memory tasks were experimentally manipulated between participants: In a gain-framing condition, participants accumulated rewards, dependent on the proportion of target events to which they responded accurately. In a loss-framing condition, participants received an initial endowment from which losses were deducted, dependent on the proportion of targets they missed. We measured memory accuracy, perceived task importance, and ongoing-task performance.ResultsGains and losses had different effects on memory across age groups: Age × Motivational Valence interactions emerged across two studies. Older adults showed relatively better memory performance to avoid losses than to achieve gains. Moreover, higher age was associated with lower memory performance (Study 1) and slower but more accurate decisions in an ongoing activity (Study 2).DiscussionThe findings reveal that motivational incentives and the framing of consequences as gains or losses moderate the relation between age and memory performance. Older adults’ memory performance may benefit when messages encourage the avoidance of losses. This may also help to design age-tailored interventions in applied settings (e.g., health-related behavior).

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian S Horn & Alexandra M Freund & Angela Gutchess, 2021. "How Do Gain and Loss Incentives Affect Memory for Intentions Across Adulthood?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(4), pages 711-721.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:4:p:711-721.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaa140
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:4:p:711-721.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.