Author
Listed:
- Lijuan Huo
- Xinyi Zhu
- Zhiwei Zheng
- Jialing Ma
- Zhuoya Ma
- Wenjun Gui
- Juan Li
- Nicole Anderson
Abstract
ObjectivesIn the last two decades, the number of intervention studies using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has grown enormously. Though some studies have shown positive influences on episodic memory among older adults, disagreement exists in the literature. Therefore, the current meta-analysis aimed to provide a quantitative assessment of the efficacy of tDCS in modulating episodic memory functions in older adults.MethodEligible studies were sham-controlled trials examining the effects of anodal tDCS on episodic memory in older adults. Twenty-four articles comprising 566 participants aged over 60 qualified for inclusion.ResultsCompared to the sham tDCS group, the active tDCS group showed significant memory improvements at both immediate poststimulation (Hedges’ g = 0.625, p = .001) and long-term follow-up (Hedges’ g = 0.404, p = .002). There were no differences in effect sizes between cognitively healthy and impaired older adults. Moderator analyses suggested that tDCS having a duration of 20 min or less, bilateral stimulation, or a larger stimulation area would produce greater benefits for episodic memory performance in older adults.DiscussionThese findings suggest that tDCS holds great promise to ameliorate memory decline in older individuals. In the future, well-designed randomized controlled trials are expected to verify the optimal stimulation protocols and determine the factors impacting the long-term effects of tDCS in enhancing episodic memory.
Suggested Citation
Lijuan Huo & Xinyi Zhu & Zhiwei Zheng & Jialing Ma & Zhuoya Ma & Wenjun Gui & Juan Li & Nicole Anderson, 2021.
"Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Episodic Memory in Older Adults: A Meta-analysis,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(4), pages 692-702.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:4:p:692-702.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:4:p:692-702.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.