IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i9p1841-1849..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Semantic Relatedness Corrects the Age-Related Binding Deficit in Working Memory and Episodic Memory

Author

Listed:
  • Vanessa M Loaiza
  • Sabina Srokova
  • Angela Gutchess

Abstract

ObjectivesIt is well known that age differentially impacts aspects of long-term episodic memory (EM): Whereas a binding deficit indicates that older adults are less capable than younger adults to encode or retrieve associations between information (e.g., the pairing between two memoranda, such as lock – race), item memory is relatively intact (e.g., recognizing lock without its original pairing).MethodWe tested whether this deficit could be corrected by facilitating establishment of the bindings in working memory (WM) through adapting the semantic relatedness of studied pairs according to participants’ ongoing performance (Experiments 1 and 2). We also examined whether this was evident for the long-term retention of pairs that were not tested in WM (Experiment 2).ResultsThe results revealed matched binding and item memory in WM and EM between age groups. Most importantly, older adults required increased semantic strength between word pairs to achieve similar performance to that of younger adults, regardless of whether pairs were immediately tested during the WM task.DiscussionThese findings indicate that relying on their superior semantic memory can correct the commonly exhibited profound deficit in binding memory in older age.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanessa M Loaiza & Sabina Srokova & Angela Gutchess, 2020. "Semantic Relatedness Corrects the Age-Related Binding Deficit in Working Memory and Episodic Memory," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(9), pages 1841-1849.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:9:p:1841-1849.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbz055
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:9:p:1841-1849.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.