IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i9p1831-1840..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Looking on the Bright Side: Aging and the Impact of Emotional Future Simulation on Subsequent Memory

Author

Listed:
  • Aleea L Devitt
  • Daniel L Schacter
  • Derek Isaacowitz

Abstract

ObjectivesWhen younger adults simulated positive future events, subsequent memory is positively biased. In the current studies, we explore age-related changes in the impact of emotional future simulation on subsequent memory.MethodsIn Experiment 1, younger and older adults simulated emotional future events before learning the hypothetical outcome of each event via narratives. Memory was assessed for emotional details contained in those narratives. In Experiment 2, a shorter temporal delay between simulation and narrative encoding was used to reduce decay of simulation memory over time.ResultsFuture simulation did not bias subsequent memory for older adults in Experiment 1. However, older adults performed similar to younger adults in Experiment 2, with more liberal responses to positive information after positive simulation.DiscussionThe impact of an optimistic outlook on subsequent memory is reduced with age, which may be at least partly attributable to declining memory for future simulations over time. This work broadens our understanding of the functional consequences of age-related declines in episodic future simulation and adds to previous work showing reduced benefits of simulation with age on tasks tapping adaptive functions.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleea L Devitt & Daniel L Schacter & Derek Isaacowitz, 2020. "Looking on the Bright Side: Aging and the Impact of Emotional Future Simulation on Subsequent Memory," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(9), pages 1831-1840.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:9:p:1831-1840.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbz041
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:9:p:1831-1840.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.