IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i5pe1-e12..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting Control Beliefs in Older Adults: A Micro-Longitudinal Study

Author

Listed:
  • Shenghao ZhangBS
  • Alyssa A GamaldoPhD
  • Shevaun D NeupertPhD
  • Jason C AllairePhD
  • Frank J InfurnaPhD

Abstract

ObjectivesThe present study examined potential sources of intra- and inter-individual differences in older adults’ control beliefs using a micro-longitudinal design.MethodOlder adults (n = 205) ranging in age from 60 to 94 (M = 72.70, SD = 6.72) completed 8 in-person testing sessions within 3 weeks which included assessments of control beliefs (Locus of Control and Perceived Competence), physical health (physical symptoms and sleep self-efficacy), stressors, emotional well-being (Positive Affect and Negative Affect), and cognition (basic cognition tests, everyday cognition, and memory failures).ResultsMultilevel models indicated that on days when older adults had higher sleep self-efficacy, more positive affect, and less negative affect, they also had more internal locus of control and higher perceived competence. Having stressors on the previous occasion was associated with lower internal locus of control on the subsequent occasion. Physical symptoms, everyday cognition, and memory failures could be predictive of locus of control for some older adults.DiscussionOur findings showed the differentiated antecedents of locus of control and perceived competence, the unique role of sleep self-efficacy, positive affect, and negative affect in understanding antecedents of both, as well as the need to study well-being and cognition antecedents of control beliefs in future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Shenghao ZhangBS & Alyssa A GamaldoPhD & Shevaun D NeupertPhD & Jason C AllairePhD & Frank J InfurnaPhD, 2020. "Predicting Control Beliefs in Older Adults: A Micro-Longitudinal Study," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(5), pages 1-12.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:5:p:e1-e12.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbz001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:5:p:e1-e12.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.