IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i2p351-356..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pathways to Linguistic Isolation Among Older U.S. Immigrants: Assessing the Role of Living Arrangements and English Proficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Zoya Gubernskaya
  • Judith Treas
  • Deborah Carr

Abstract

ObjectivesTo identify diverse pathways to linguistic isolation (LI) and explain the differences in LI for older immigrants from different countries.MethodA demographic decomposition of LI was applied to 18 largest origin subgroups of foreign-born, ages 65 and older, in the 2010–2014 American Community Survey data.ResultsLI varied from 12% for older Indians to 68% for older Ukrainians. Decomposition analysis identified 3 components: (a) Limited English proficiency (LEP); (b) Solitary living; and (c) Limited English of co-resident others. The relative contribution of components differed by country of origin, pointing to different pathways to LI. Older Mexicans have the highest LEP, but moderate LI due to infrequent solitary living and the English proficiency of co-resident others. Many Chinese and Vietnamese older adults are LI because they live with other LEP adults. Older Europeans’ common pathway to LI is solitary living.DiscussionComponents of LI in ethnic communities can inform communication strategies for older LEP lacking access to critical information.

Suggested Citation

  • Zoya Gubernskaya & Judith Treas & Deborah Carr, 2020. "Pathways to Linguistic Isolation Among Older U.S. Immigrants: Assessing the Role of Living Arrangements and English Proficiency," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(2), pages 351-356.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:2:p:351-356.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx178
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:2:p:351-356.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.