IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i2p338-348..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The More We Are in Control, the Merrier? Partner Perceived Control and Negative Affect in the Daily Lives of Older Couples

Author

Listed:
  • Johanna Drewelies
  • Hannah Schade
  • Gizem Hülür
  • Christiane A Hoppmann
  • Nilam Ram
  • Denis Gerstorf
  • Shevaun Neupert

Abstract

ObjectivesIt is well established that daily perceived control is closely associated with lower negative affect (NA) among older adults. However, it is an open question whether control perceptions of one’s partner are also uniquely associated with one’s own NA.MethodTo examine such associations in dyads of older long-term partners, we make use of data obtained 6 times a day over 7 consecutive days as participants went about their everyday lives (N = 87 couples; mean age = 75 years; mean relationship length = 46 years). Our multilevel actor–partner models for dyadic data analyses covary for relevant individual and couple differences in sociodemographic characteristics, self-reported physical health, and cognitive functioning.ResultsCorroborating and extending earlier reports, results reveal that higher momentary perceived control was associated with lower NA. Most importantly, we found that higher momentary perceived control of the partner is additionally and uniquely associated with lower NA of the actor.DiscussionWe discuss possible mechanisms and underlying pathways of how perceived control may help both partners downregulate their negative emotions in daily life. We close by considering conceptual and practical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Johanna Drewelies & Hannah Schade & Gizem Hülür & Christiane A Hoppmann & Nilam Ram & Denis Gerstorf & Shevaun Neupert, 2020. "The More We Are in Control, the Merrier? Partner Perceived Control and Negative Affect in the Daily Lives of Older Couples," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(2), pages 338-348.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:2:p:338-348.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gby009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:2:p:338-348.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.