Author
Listed:
- Teja Pristavec
- Elizabeth A Luth
- J Jill Suitor
Abstract
ObjectiveInformal caregivers are crucial to maintaining older adults’ health, but few studies examine how caregiving receipt is associated with older person longevity. In a nationally representative sample, we prospectively explore whether and how having an informal caregiver is associated with older adult overall mortality, and how caregivers’ burden and benefits perceptions relate to care recipient mortality.MethodsWe match six National Health and Aging Trends Study waves (2011–2016) with 2011 National Study of Caregiving data, conducting survival analysis on 7,369 older adults and 1,327 older adult-informal caregiver dyads.ResultsHaving an informal caregiver is associated with 36% (p < .001) higher mortality risk over 6-year follow-up, adjusting for demographic, economic, and health factors. Older adults whose caregivers perceive only burden have 38% higher (p < .05) mortality risk than those with caregivers reporting neither burden nor benefits. This risk is reduced from 38% higher to 5% higher (p < .001) for older adults with caregivers reporting benefits alongside burden, compared to those with caregivers reporting neither perception.DiscussionHaving a caregiver may signal impending decline beyond known mortality factors. However, interventions to increase caregivers’ benefit perceptions and reduce their burden may decrease mortality risk for older adults with declining health and functional ability.
Suggested Citation
Teja Pristavec & Elizabeth A Luth & J Jill Suitor, 2020.
"Informal Caregiver Burden, Benefits, and Older Adult Mortality: A Survival Analysis,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(10), pages 2193-2206.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:10:p:2193-2206.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:10:p:2193-2206.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.