IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i7p1163-1173..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differential Age Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Associative Memory

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan C Leach
  • Matthew P McCurdy
  • Michael C Trumbo
  • Laura E Matzen
  • Eric D Leshikar
  • Nicole Anderson

Abstract

Objectives Older adults experience associative memory deficits relative to younger adults (Old & Naveh-Benjamin, 2008). The aim of this study was to test the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on face-name associative memory in older and younger adults. MethodExperimenters applied active (1.5 mA) or sham (0.1 mA) stimulation with the anode placed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) during a face-name encoding task, and measured both cued recall and recognition performance. Participants completed memory tests immediately after stimulation and after a 24-h delay to examine both immediate and delayed stimulation effects on memory. Results Results showed improved face-name associative memory performance for both recall and recognition measures, but only for younger adults, whereas there was no difference between active and sham stimulation for older adults. For younger adults, stimulation-induced memory improvements persisted after a 24-h delay, suggesting delayed effects of tDCS after a consolidation period. Discussion Although effective in younger adults, these results suggest that older adults may be resistant to this intervention, at least under the stimulation parameters used in the current study. This finding is inconsistent with a commonly seen trend, where tDCS effects on cognition are larger in older than younger adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan C Leach & Matthew P McCurdy & Michael C Trumbo & Laura E Matzen & Eric D Leshikar & Nicole Anderson, 2019. "Differential Age Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Associative Memory," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(7), pages 1163-1173.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:7:p:1163-1173.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gby003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:7:p:1163-1173.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.