IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i6p933-942..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age Differences in Face Processing: The Role of Perceptual Degradation and Holistic Processing

Author

Listed:
  • Isabelle BoutetPhD
  • Bozana Meinhardt-InjacPhD
  • Nicole AndersonPhDDecision Editor

Abstract

ObjectivesWe simultaneously investigated the role of three hypotheses regarding age-related differences in face processing: perceptual degradation, impaired holistic processing, and an interaction between the two.MethodsYoung adults (YA) aged 20–33-year olds, middle-age adults (MA) aged 50–64-year olds, and older adults (OA) aged 65–82-year olds were tested on the context congruency paradigm, which allows measurement of face-specific holistic processing across the life span (Meinhardt-Injac, Persike & Meinhardt, 2014. Acta Psychologica, 151, 155–163). Perceptual degradation was examined by measuring performance with faces that were not filtered (FSF), with faces filtered to preserve low spatial frequencies (LSF), and with faces filtered to preserve high spatial frequencies (HSF).ResultsWe found that reducing perceptual signal strength had a greater impact on MA and OA for HSF faces, but not LSF faces. Context congruency effects were significant and of comparable magnitude across ages for FSF, LSF, and HSF faces. By using watches as control objects, we show that these holistic effects reflect face-specific mechanisms in all age groups.DiscussionOur results support the perceptual degradation hypothesis for faces containing only HSF and suggest that holistic processing is preserved in aging even under conditions of reduced signal strength.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabelle BoutetPhD & Bozana Meinhardt-InjacPhD & Nicole AndersonPhDDecision Editor, 2019. "Age Differences in Face Processing: The Role of Perceptual Degradation and Holistic Processing," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(6), pages 933-942.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:6:p:933-942.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx172
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:6:p:933-942.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.