IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i3p474-483..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dietary Habits and Cognitive Impairment Risk Among Oldest-Old Chinese

Author

Listed:
  • Ruopeng An
  • Gordon Liu
  • Naiman Khan
  • Hai Yan
  • Youfa Wang

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study examined the longitudinal relationship between dietary habits and cognitive impairment among the oldest-old Chinese.MethodCognitively intact adults aged 80 or older (N = 4,749) came from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey. Cognitive impairment was assessed by Mini-mental State Examination. Cox regressions were performed to examine the relationship between dietary habits and cognitive impairment onset during follow-up period of 1998–2012, adjusting for various time-variant and time-invariant individual characteristics.ResultsCompared with those who rarely/never consumed fruit, vegetables, meat, and soybean-derived products, participants consuming such products almost every day were 21%, 25%, 17%, and 20% less likely to develop cognitive impairment during follow-up, respectively. Compared with those who rarely/never consumed sugar, participants consuming sugar almost every day were 17% more likely to develop cognitive impairment during follow-up. Consumption of fish, egg, salt-preserved vegetable, tea, and garlic was not found to be associated with cognitive impairment.DiscussionDietary habits might profoundly impact cognitive functioning among the oldest-old Chinese. This work has limitations pertaining to study design and measure. Future work adopting experimental design and refined dietary measures is warranted to confirm these findings and inform public nutrition practices aiming at preventing cognitive decline among the oldest-old Chinese population.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruopeng An & Gordon Liu & Naiman Khan & Hai Yan & Youfa Wang, 2019. "Dietary Habits and Cognitive Impairment Risk Among Oldest-Old Chinese," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(3), pages 474-483.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:3:p:474-483.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbw170
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:3:p:474-483.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.