IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i2p318-328..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chronic Stress and Negative Marital Quality Among Older Couples: Associations With Waist Circumference

Author

Listed:
  • Kira S Birditt
  • Nicky J Newton
  • Jim A Cranford
  • Noah J Webster

Abstract

ObjectiveMore than a third of the U.S. population of older adults is obese. The present study tests the Dyadic Biopsychosocial Model of Marriage and Health, which hypothesizes that, among married couples, individual and partner chronic stress predicts increased waist circumference and these links are exacerbated in negative quality marriages. Method Participants were from the nationally representative longitudinal Health and Retirement Study (HRS). A total of 2,042 married individuals (in 1,098 married couples) completed psychosocial and waist circumference assessments in 2006 and 2010. Analyses examined whether negative marital quality and chronic stress in Wave 1 (2006) were associated with changes in waist circumference over time. Results Actor–partner interdependence models revealed that greater partner stress, rather than individuals’ own reports of stress, was associated with increased waist circumference over time. Higher perceived negative marital quality among husbands and lower negative marital quality among wives exacerbated the positive link between partner stress and waist circumference. Discussion Consistent with the Dyadic Biopsychosocial Model of Marriage and Health, partner stress has direct associations with waist circumference among couples and this link is moderated by negative marital quality. Thus, dyadic perceptions of stress and negative marital quality are important to consider for understanding marriage and obesity.

Suggested Citation

  • Kira S Birditt & Nicky J Newton & Jim A Cranford & Noah J Webster, 2019. "Chronic Stress and Negative Marital Quality Among Older Couples: Associations With Waist Circumference," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(2), pages 318-328.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:2:p:318-328.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbw112
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:2:p:318-328.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.