IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v74y2019i1p29-37..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Additive Effects of Forecasted and Reported Stressors on Negative Affect

Author

Listed:
  • Stacey B Scott
  • Jinhyuk Kim
  • Joshua M Smyth
  • David M Almeida
  • Martin J Sliwinski

Abstract

Objectives Many studies of daily life have framed stressors as unpredictable disruptions. We tested age differences in whether individuals forecast upcoming stressors, whether individuals show anticipatory stress responses prior to stressors, and whether having previously forecasted any stressors moderates stressor exposure on negative affect. MethodAdults (n = 237; age 25–65) completed surveys five times daily for 14 days on current negative affect, stressor exposure, and stressor forecasts. Results Older age was associated with slightly greater likelihood of reported stressors but unrelated to forecasted stressors. Following forecasted stressors, individuals were four times more likely to report a stressor had occurred; age did not moderate this effect. Even prior to stressors, current negative affect was significantly higher when individuals forecasted stressors compared to when no stressors were forecast. No support was found for forecasts buffering effects of stressors on negative affect and age did not moderate this interaction. Instead, the effects were additive. Discussion In an age-heterogeneous sample, individuals showed early and persistent affective responses in advance of stressors. Anticipatory stress responses may be a mechanism for chronic stress.

Suggested Citation

  • Stacey B Scott & Jinhyuk Kim & Joshua M Smyth & David M Almeida & Martin J Sliwinski, 2019. "Additive Effects of Forecasted and Reported Stressors on Negative Affect," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(1), pages 29-37.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:1:p:29-37.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gby068
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:74:y:2019:i:1:p:29-37.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.