Author
Listed:
- Steve Balsis PhD
- Lisa Geraci PhD
- Jared Benge PhD
- Deborah A Lowe PhD
- Tabina K Choudhury MS
- Robert Tirso BS
- Rachelle S Doody MD, PhD
Abstract
Objectives Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive disease reflected in markers across assessment modalities, including neuroimaging, cognitive testing, and evaluation of adaptive function. Identifying a single continuum of decline across assessment modalities in a single sample is statistically challenging because of the multivariate nature of the data. To address this challenge, we implemented advanced statistical analyses designed specifically to model complex data across a single continuum.MethodWe analyzed data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; N = 1,056), focusing on indicators from the assessments of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volume, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) metabolic activity, cognitive performance, and adaptive function. Item response theory was used to identify the continuum of decline. Then, through a process of statistical scaling, indicators across all modalities were linked to that continuum and analyzed.ResultsFindings revealed that measures of MRI volume, FDG-PET metabolic activity, and adaptive function added measurement precision beyond that provided by cognitive measures, particularly in the relatively mild range of disease severity. More specifically, MRI volume, and FDG-PET metabolic activity become compromised in the very mild range of severity, followed by cognitive performance and finally adaptive function.ConclusionOur statistically derived models of the AD pathological cascade are consistent with existing theoretical models.
Suggested Citation
Steve Balsis PhD & Lisa Geraci PhD & Jared Benge PhD & Deborah A Lowe PhD & Tabina K Choudhury MS & Robert Tirso BS & Rachelle S Doody MD, PhD, 2018.
"Statistical Model of Dynamic Markers of the Alzheimer’s Pathological Cascade,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(6), pages 964-973.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:6:p:964-973.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:6:p:964-973.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.