IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v73y2018i4p704-712..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Social Network Size and Quality Affect End-of-Life Surrogate Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Sara M Moorman
  • Kathrin Boerner

Abstract

ObjectiveOlder adults typically choose their next-of-kin to serve as surrogate on their behalf should they become decisionally incapacitated at the end of life. However, some older adults do not choose their closest relative, even if they are married or parents. We compared the social networks of these latter persons to their peers who prefer a next-of-kin surrogate, anticipating differences in relationship quality and network size.MethodsWe used multinomial logistic regressions to investigate the quality and size of the social networks of 1,245 persons whose next of kin was a spouse and 723 persons whose next-of-kin was an adult child, and who participated in the 2005 National Social Life, Health and Aging Project.ResultsTwenty percent of those whose next-of-kin was a spouse and 32% of those whose next-of-kin was an adult child either bypassed that person in favor of a different surrogate, or preferred no surrogate at all. Low-quality next-of-kin relationships pushed older adults away from next-of-kin, and a greater number of high-quality relationships outside the immediate family pulled older adults toward a surrogate who was not next-of-kin.DiscussionWe discuss what is distinctive about the social networks of each group, and the implications for end-of-life support.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara M Moorman & Kathrin Boerner, 2018. "How Social Network Size and Quality Affect End-of-Life Surrogate Preferences," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(4), pages 704-712.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:4:p:704-712.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbx031
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:4:p:704-712.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.