IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v71y2016i3p405-414..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Anticipated Gains and Losses on Preferences About Future Caregiving

Author

Listed:
  • Margund K. Rohr
  • Frieder R. Lang

Abstract

Objectives. A growing amount of research has suggested that caregiving is not only associated with burden but entails also the potential for positive outcomes. By contrast, less is known about the roles of gain–loss-anticipations on future caregiving.

Suggested Citation

  • Margund K. Rohr & Frieder R. Lang, 2016. "The Role of Anticipated Gains and Losses on Preferences About Future Caregiving," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 71(3), pages 405-414.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:71:y:2016:i:3:p:405-414.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbu145
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yaeji Kim-Knauss & Frieder R. Lang & Margund K. Rohr & Helene H. Fung, 2020. "For a better me? Or for a better us? Perceived utilities of aging preparatory activities and positive future thinking in Germany, USA and Hong Kong," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 259-269, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:71:y:2016:i:3:p:405-414.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.