IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v71y2016i2p265-274..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age, Rumination, and Emotional Recovery From a Psychosocial Stressor

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer W. Robinette
  • Susan T. Charles

Abstract

Objectives. Exposure to psychosocial stressors often elicits increases in negative affect and blood pressure (BP). Rumination, or thinking about a stressor after it passes, is associated with delayed recovery. Given that older age is associated with greater BP reactivity to psychosocial stressors, rumination may be more detrimental to the recovery of older adults than younger adults. The current study examined this question. We hypothesized that prolonged distress resulting from rumination has greater effects on the recovery of older than younger adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer W. Robinette & Susan T. Charles, 2016. "Age, Rumination, and Emotional Recovery From a Psychosocial Stressor," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 71(2), pages 265-274.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:71:y:2016:i:2:p:265-274.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbu097
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christina M Marini & Stephanie J Wilson & Suyoung Nah & Lynn M Martire & Martin J Sliwinski & Rodlescia Sneed, 2021. "Rumination and Sleep Quality Among Older Adults: Examining the Role of Social Support [Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedur," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(10), pages 1948-1959.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:71:y:2016:i:2:p:265-274.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.