IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v70y2015i1p91-99..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship of Age to Personal Network Size, Relational Multiplexity, and Proximity to Alters in the Western United States

Author

Listed:
  • Emily J. Smith
  • Christopher S. Marcum
  • Adam Boessen
  • Zack W. Almquist
  • John R. Hipp
  • Nicholas N. Nagle
  • Carter T. Butts

Abstract

Objectives. This study examines the association of age and other sociodemographic variables with properties of personal networks; using samples of individuals residing in the rural western United States and the City of Los Angeles, we evaluate the degree to which these associations vary with geographical context. For both samples, we test the hypothesis that age is negatively associated with network size (i.e., degree) and positively associated with network multiplexity (the extent of overlap) on 6 different relations: core discussion members, social activity participants, emergency contacts, neighborhood safety contacts, job informants, and kin. We also examine the relationship between age and spatial proximity to alters.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily J. Smith & Christopher S. Marcum & Adam Boessen & Zack W. Almquist & John R. Hipp & Nicholas N. Nagle & Carter T. Butts, 2015. "The Relationship of Age to Personal Network Size, Relational Multiplexity, and Proximity to Alters in the Western United States," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(1), pages 91-99.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:70:y:2015:i:1:p:91-99.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbu142
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:70:y:2015:i:1:p:91-99.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.