IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v65by2009i1p32-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prior Experience Supports New Learning of Relations in Aging

Author

Listed:
  • Melanie L. Ostreicher
  • Sandra N. Moses
  • R. Shayna Rosenbaum
  • Jennifer D. Ryan

Abstract

This work examined whether semantically relevant schemas could facilitate learning in the transverse patterning (TP) task, which requires participants to learn the value of each stimulus in relation to the stimulus with which it is paired (e.g., A wins over B, B wins over C, C wins over A). Younger and older adults received the standard TP in isolation (alone condition), with additional sessions (practice condition), or with 2 TP sessions, which used familiar stimuli with known relations (e.g., rock--paper--scissors, semantic condition). Accuracy improved when training was provided within the context of a previously known relational framework, beyond the benefits obtained with extended practice with the task. When levels of education and vocabulary scores were considered as covariates, age-related deficits in accuracy were observed in the alone and practice conditions but were eliminated in the semantic condition. Extended practice and appealing to prior knowledge improved explicit awareness for the stimulus contingencies for each age-group. Thus, age-related deficits in learning relations among items may be remediated using existing relational information within semantic memory as an analog for new learning. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Melanie L. Ostreicher & Sandra N. Moses & R. Shayna Rosenbaum & Jennifer D. Ryan, 2009. "Prior Experience Supports New Learning of Relations in Aging," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 65(1), pages 32-41.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:65b:y:2009:i:1:p:32-41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbp081
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:65b:y:2009:i:1:p:32-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.