IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v64by2009i5p551-559.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of Social Transgressions in Adulthood

Author

Listed:
  • Laura M. Miller
  • Susan T. Charles
  • Karen L. Fingerman

Abstract

People may react differently when individuals of different ages commit a social faux pas. Younger (22 to 35 years old) and older (65 to 77 years old) participants read vignettes where age of characters committing social transgressions varied (young vs. old). Participants rated whether the offended person would respond with engagement, confrontational, and avoidant behaviors and how much people would blame or forgive the transgressor. Multilevel models revealed endorsement of avoidant behaviors with older transgressors, confrontational behaviors with younger transgressors, and engagement behaviors with both. Levels of blame and forgiveness mediated this association, with less blame and greater forgiveness of older adults. Discussion focuses on the social input model and why adults may regulate reactions to interpersonal problems with older adults. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura M. Miller & Susan T. Charles & Karen L. Fingerman, 2009. "Perceptions of Social Transgressions in Adulthood," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(5), pages 551-559.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:64b:y:2009:i:5:p:551-559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbp062
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Allison R. Heid & Steven H. Zarit & Karen L. Fingerman, 2016. ""My Parent is so Stubborn!" -Perceptions of Aging Parents' Persistence, Insistence, and Resistance," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 71(4), pages 602-612.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:64b:y:2009:i:5:p:551-559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.