IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v64by2009i1p4-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the Effect of Reported Physical Activity on Disability Mediated by Cognitive Performance in White and African American Older Adults?

Author

Listed:
  • Mihaela A. Popa
  • Sandra L. Reynolds
  • Brent J. Small

Abstract

This study examined if reported physical activity has beneficial outcomes on disability through cognitive performance--mediated effects and if these mediation effects are comparable for White and African American elders. Longitudinal data from the Assets and Health Dynamics among the Oldest Old study (N = 4,472) are used to test mediation in multilevel models. During the 7-year follow-up, cognitive performance mediated the effects of reported physical activity on disability in the entire sample and in Whites but not in African Americans. Our results indicate that reported physical activity may delay the disability development through improvement in cognitive performance. Unmeasured education and comorbidity influences may have obscured the mediation effects in African Americans. Reported physical activity plays a key role in the independence of older adults and should be particularly promoted in African Americans and during the entire life course. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihaela A. Popa & Sandra L. Reynolds & Brent J. Small, 2009. "Is the Effect of Reported Physical Activity on Disability Mediated by Cognitive Performance in White and African American Older Adults?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(1), pages 4-13.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:64b:y:2009:i:1:p:4-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbn030
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:64b:y:2009:i:1:p:4-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.