IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ereveh/v28y2024i1p51-66..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Breadwinner, bread maker: the gender division of labour in 1930s rural Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Giulia Mancini

Abstract

This paper uses microdata assembled from a collection of family monographs to examine female work among rural households in interwar Italy. It finds that female employment in agriculture was very high (approximately 80 percent), which contradicts available estimates from population censuses (50 percent or less). Yet despite the pervasiveness of female work, time use remained extremely segregated by gender—women devoted less than half as many hours as men to paid work, instead specializing in producing services for the family. These results substantiate the calls for caution in interpreting standard labour market indicators, such as labour force participation, in the preindustrial past.

Suggested Citation

  • Giulia Mancini, 2024. "Breadwinner, bread maker: the gender division of labour in 1930s rural Italy," European Review of Economic History, European Historical Economics Society, vol. 28(1), pages 51-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ereveh:v:28:y:2024:i:1:p:51-66.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ereh/head009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ereveh:v:28:y:2024:i:1:p:51-66.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ereh .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.