IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ereveh/v25y2021i2p379-403..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Domestic industrialization under colonization: evidence from Korea, 1932–1940
[Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela]

Author

Listed:
  • Yutaka Arimoto
  • Changmin Lee

Abstract

This paper examines whether the influx of Japanese establishments in colonial Korea during the 1930s suppressed the entry of Korean establishments. We construct new subsector–county-level panel data to exploit variations across counties within subsectors. We find that Korean entry rates were higher in counties with a higher presence of Japanese establishments. However, the spillover effects do vary across subsectors, and we find suggestive evidence of negative impacts of Japanese presence in subsectors with more large-scaled establishments. Taken together, Japanese establishments did seem to raise entry barriers in some subsectors but also functioned as a catalyst for Korean entry in other subsectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Yutaka Arimoto & Changmin Lee, 2021. "Domestic industrialization under colonization: evidence from Korea, 1932–1940 [Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela]," European Review of Economic History, European Historical Economics Society, vol. 25(2), pages 379-403.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ereveh:v:25:y:2021:i:2:p:379-403.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ereh/heaa012
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ereveh:v:25:y:2021:i:2:p:379-403.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ereh .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.