IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ereveh/v22y2018i2p233-259..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“The Lesser of Two Weevils”: British victualling organization in the long eighteenth century

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas W Allen

Abstract

The British Navy’s Victualling Board was created in 1683 after more than a century of victual attempts rife with corruption, incompetence, and inedibles; and ended in 1832 with the creation of the modern Admiralty. Historians are unanimous that the Victualling Board was an immediate and continuous improvement, daily feeding tens of thousands across the globe. On the other hand, to the modern eye, many aspects of the Victualling Board appear odd and costly—excessive inventories, unpassed accounts, charge and discharge accounting, in-house production, mutual surveillance, and excessive punishments. Here these two observations are reconciled. I argue that the Board’s organization was a clever response to pre-modern transaction cost problems; that is, the Board was designed to create compatible incentives subject to the measurement constraints of the time.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas W Allen, 2018. "“The Lesser of Two Weevils”: British victualling organization in the long eighteenth century," European Review of Economic History, European Historical Economics Society, vol. 22(2), pages 233-259.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ereveh:v:22:y:2018:i:2:p:233-259.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ereh/hex020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ereveh:v:22:y:2018:i:2:p:233-259.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ereh .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.