IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ereveh/v19y2015i2p109-127..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Editor's choice Self-defeating austerity? Evidence from 1930s' Britain

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas Crafts
  • Terence C. Mills

Abstract

Self-defeating austerity entails "perverse effects" of fiscal consolidation such that fiscal indicators deteriorate. Inter alia, this depends on the size of the fiscal multiplier as Keynes (1933. The Means to Prosperity. London: Macmillan) underlined. We find that the government-expenditure multiplier was less than 1 in 1930s' Britain. Austerity was not self-defeating in the long run and even its initial impact probably did not raise the public debt-to-GDP ratio. In the later 1930s, there was a "fiscal free lunch" in that deficit-financed government spending would have improved public finances enough to pay for the interest on the extra debt.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas Crafts & Terence C. Mills, 2015. "Editor's choice Self-defeating austerity? Evidence from 1930s' Britain," European Review of Economic History, European Historical Economics Society, vol. 19(2), pages 109-127.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ereveh:v:19:y:2015:i:2:p:109-127.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ereh/heu024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Postel-Vinay, Natacha & Cloyne, James & Dimsdale, Nicholas, 2018. "Taxes and Growth: New Narrative Evidence from Interwar Britain," CEPR Discussion Papers 12962, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. George Chouliarakis & Tadeusz Gwiazdowski & Sophia Lazaretou, 2016. "The Effect of Fiscal Policy on Output in Times of Crisis and Prosperity: Historical Evidence From Greece ," Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research Discussion Paper Series 230, Economics, The University of Manchester.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ereveh:v:19:y:2015:i:2:p:109-127.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ereh .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.