IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/envlaw/v37y2025i3p598-608..html

The responsibility of states for environmental damage caused by multinational corporations: the case of TRAFIGURA’s Toxic Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Patient Mpunga-Biayi

Abstract

The judgment delivered in 2023 by the African Court on Human and Peoples Rights in the Trafigura toxic waste case highlights two major lessons regarding the responsibility of States for environmental damage caused by multinational corporations. First, States are obligated to adopt proactive measures to prevent such damage, particularly when it involves hazardous substances. This obligation requires the establishment and reinforcement of a clear legal, regulatory, and institutional framework, accompanied by stringent standards governing the use, transportation, storage, and disposal of toxic substances. States must also ensure the effective enforcement of these standards through monitoring and control mechanisms, as well as deterrent sanctions for violations. Second, States have a duty to guarantee effective remedies for victims of environmental harm caused by multinational corporations. In this case, the Court adopts a broad and holistic interpretation of this duty, emphasising its various essential dimensions including that states must establish accessible, fair, and efficient judicial and administrative mechanisms to enable individuals and affected communities to assert their rights. This obligation also includes adopting measures to identify, investigate, and prosecute those responsible for environmental harm. The Court underscores the complementarity of prevention, reparation, and justice measures, which are essential to protecting the rights of victims and the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Patient Mpunga-Biayi, 2025. "The responsibility of states for environmental damage caused by multinational corporations: the case of TRAFIGURA’s Toxic Waste," Journal of Environmental Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(3), pages 598-608.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:37:y:2025:i:3:p:598-608.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jel/eqaf015
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:37:y:2025:i:3:p:598-608.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.