IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/envlaw/v37y2025i3p537-557..html

Embracing relationality in planning law to help restructure relationships between people and land—a case from Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Paul J Govind
  • Peter J Davies

Abstract

This article explores the role of relationality in the context of planning law in New South Wales, Australia. Planning law plays an important role in structuring the relations between actors seeking to transform land and space, and those seeking to resist or at least restrain the proposed change and/or its effects. Overall, planning law is developer centric meaning that the interpretation and application of planning law influence the structure of relationships in ways that are weighted in favour of the interests of the developer(s). We argue that the emergence of different values that operate in tension with developer interests could precipitate a restructure of relations relevant to planning law. More precisely, we demonstrate how Salama v Northern Beaches Council, a decision delivered in 2020 by the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales regarding land use development, specifically seawalls in the coastal zone, forecasts a potential restructure of relations. The approval of the seawalls shows that relationality is relevant in evaluating change under planning law.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul J Govind & Peter J Davies, 2025. "Embracing relationality in planning law to help restructure relationships between people and land—a case from Australia," Journal of Environmental Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(3), pages 537-557.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:37:y:2025:i:3:p:537-557.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jel/eqaf029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:37:y:2025:i:3:p:537-557.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.