IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/envlaw/v37y2025i3p511-536..html

Systemic biodiversity litigation: how litigation addresses structural causes and drivers of biodiversity loss

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Fenn

Abstract

This article queries the extent to which biodiversity litigation considers structural drivers of biodiversity loss, which typically remain unaddressed by the dominant biodiversity litigation approach that tends to focus on single projects, protected species, or protected areas. Based on a database of 214 biodiversity litigation cases, this study identifies eight litigation strategies, each discussed in detail. In this way, this article helps to better understand what sets systemic biodiversity litigation apart from other forms of biodiversity litigation and provides a way of categorizing the same. It also contributes to the consolidation of biodiversity litigation, more generally, as a field of legal scholarship and highlights the complex and multi-faceted nature of the subject that needs scholarly attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Fenn, 2025. "Systemic biodiversity litigation: how litigation addresses structural causes and drivers of biodiversity loss," Journal of Environmental Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(3), pages 511-536.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:37:y:2025:i:3:p:511-536.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jel/eqaf027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:37:y:2025:i:3:p:511-536.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.